Last year, The Oakland Post adopted a comment policy that was controversial. After much consideration, The Oakland Post has made the decision to adjust its comment policy. The Oakland Post is a publication that welcomes open discourse, debate and dissent. We recognize the importance of sharing different perspectives and serving as a platform for community discussion.
We hope that the updated comment policy will give our readers who hold different viewpoints the opportunity to engage in important debate. However, we ask that you post in accordance with our newly adopted commenting policy and maintain civil discourse.
In order to keep the comment section in our articles pleasant for everyone, we ask that you abide by the following policies below.
- No comments which contain threats, violence or defamatory language.
- No comments which violate any local, state, national or international law.
- No comments which are obscene, predatory, pornographic, sexually explicit, or vulgar.
- No comments which violate a person’s right to privacy.
- No comments which degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability, or other classification.
- No comments which are intended to intimidate or harass.
- No comments which include personal attacks toward Oakland Post staff.
Comments are either approved or rejected, and are not edited by The Oakland Post. Violating any of the above policies will result in comment removal and may result in a suspension or ban from The Post’s comment section.
The Oakland Post and oaklandpostonline.com take no responsibility for the views expressed in user posts, which do not necessarily reflect the views of The Oakland Post or oaklandpostonline.com.
J.K. El Emenopi • Oct 9, 2023 at 10:39 AM
The difficult part of this policy is that some viewpoints are themselves offensive to some people, especially when it comes to religious and political issues. The whole point of the first amendment protecting free speech is that censorship is worse than offending people. It virtually guarantees that people are going to be offended. So while I think this policy is an improvement, I also feel compelled to point out that using “offensive” as an unqualified criteria for removal or rejection is going to end up leaving you in no better a position than before.
I suggest qualifying that criteria to read *deliberately* offensive. It is one thing to express an opinion that others find offensive. It is another to express an opinion in order to *deliberately* offend others. The former is impossible to avoid in public discourse, but the latter has no place in civil discourse.
yousef • Oct 10, 2023 at 2:26 PM
i commented on this article and they censored my comment that basically said what you said. Sometimes you NEED to offend someone because the truth of what you’re saying is offensive to them. i would argue that pointing out something that is true but highly offensive should never be censored.
i believe my previous comment was censored because i pointed out the islamic founder Mouhammed consummated marriage with a 9 year old (Aisha). Furthermore the Quran permits divorcing (which implies permission to marry) prepubescent girls in Chapter 65:4.
Yousef • Oct 12, 2023 at 5:44 AM
OP stop censoring comments
yousef • Sep 29, 2023 at 12:56 PM
stop censoring comments
yousef • Sep 12, 2023 at 8:59 AM
This is MUCH better than the previous policy. Hats off to Ariana and the crew on a comment policy that isnt completely arbitrary. Good move by the EIC and the crew, lets see if you stick with it.