Grizzlies for Choice presents ‘How to Talk About Abortion’
The Grizzlies for Choice (GFC) student organization hosted its “How to Talk About Abortion” event in the Lake Michigan Room of the Oakland Center (OC) on Oct. 13. The informative meeting focused on teaching students how to talk about abortion in an inclusive way without perpetuating harmful stigma.
Attendees were welcomed to the event and encouraged to take coloring pages and Planned Parenthood-provided free condoms and educational materials. Grizzlies for Choice President Mags Rose began the event by setting boundaries to create a safe, welcoming environment for all students to freely learn and engage.
“This is a safe space,” Rose said. “We welcome individuals of all identities and beliefs, but if they become distrustful, we will ask them to leave.”
Rose also pointed out the importance of GFC’s limited supply of condoms, which they are able to supply to students for free. She urged everyone to be respectful of the resource, as many individuals are uncomfortable or unable to buy condoms themselves.
After the ground rules were established, Hannah Brendle — the GFC’s social media coordinator — began the presentation by providing general advice. She explained that it is imperative to be inclusive and mindful when discussing abortion.
“Don’t be afraid to talk about the topic of abortion, but pay attention to the words you use,” Brendle said. “For example — as an alternative to ‘pro-life,’ we like to use ‘anti-abortion,’ which is more clear and accurate phrasing.”
It was also recommended that individuals avoid qualifying pregnancy with the word “unintended,” as this word choice can be perceived as invasive by many. The simple term “pregnancy” is sufficient.
Presenters explained that when talking about abortion to someone who may have gone through the experience themselves, it can be harmful to use the phrase “I support abortion, but I would never…” This can make the person feel extremely uncomfortable and judged for their actions.
“Explaining your ideology on abortion to someone who has experienced one makes it seem like you are not a safe person to talk to,” GFC Vice President Katie Kramer said. “Be an ally.”
One commonly overlooked aspect of conversations surrounding abortions is a gendered language. Women-focused language can leave other identities underrepresented and excluded from these discussions.
“It is important to refrain from using gendered terms, because more people have the ability to carry a pregnancy than just women,” Kramer said. “Through gender swaps — such as using the phrase ‘reproductive rights’ instead of ‘women’s rights’ — we can correct this issue.”
Many common symbols used by advocates for reproductive rights with good intentions can be severely harmful to the community. For example, the use of a coat hanger to represent unsafe abortion access can be triggering and make individuals fearful of abortions.
“Confronting stigma can be uncomfortable — it should be,” Rose said. “There is not one kind of person that gets abortions. Everyone deserves access to safe and legal abortions.”
At the end of the presentation, GFC urged attendees to vote yes on Michigan’s Proposal 3 and attend future educational events hosted by the organization. To conclude, students were given the chance to win candy by hitting a handmade piñata shaped like a uterus.
“This was my first GFC event that I was able to attend this year, and I was pleasantly surprised,” Oakland University sophomore Ethan Lehman-Pace said. “The topics covered in the presentation were extremely interesting and useful.”
GFC will be hosting their next event, a Sexual Wellness Carnival, on Oct. 27 from 3-5 p.m. in the Gold Ambassador Rooms of the OC. Students will be able to learn more about sexual wellness resources offered on campus and have the chance to win several sex-positive prizes.
yousef • Oct 19, 2022 at 10:18 AM
“It is important to refrain from using gendered terms, because more people have the ability to carry a pregnancy than just women,”
The idea that a sex other than women can get pregnant is a-scientific. I challenge anyone to point to someone who is a man that has carried a child to term.
furthermore your seminar was basically how to more effectively use euphemisms to mask what abortion is and does. Abortion is an intentional procedure to intervene and end a uterine pregnancy that does result in a live birth. Stop masking language to hide the fact the youre destroying human life.
Address the following deductive argument:
1. Human life is precious, sacred, and should be protected
2. unborn human offspring is a separate life from the mother by all scientific accounts
3. therefore unborn human life should be protected.
OP don’t censor my comments
Word count is 149
not yousef • Oct 19, 2022 at 2:16 PM
According to Yousef and premise #2, we wouldn’t be able to remove cancer cells since they have their own DNA and “life” separate from someone. It isn’t about life, it is about your absolute right to bodily autonomy. Weak opinion, go comment on another news publication goofball
yousef • Oct 19, 2022 at 3:37 PM
Interesting to compare cancer and unborn children.
Cancer cells are “alive” in that they are cells that undergo some type of metabolic processes however they are distinctly different from unborn human beings. Cancer cells are an anomaly in the human system, a defect. Everyone in the field of oncology would agree. This stands in contrast to human reproduction which is not a defect or anomaly but rather a feature of not just human existence but most living species i can think of.
With that said i think your analogy fails to adequately compare the two.
Absolute rights to bodily autonomy do not exist and we as a society recognize this in our laws and social structures. We have plenty of laws prohibiting certain drug use, we have social structures in place to prevent self termination, national suicide prevention hotlines, doctors can hold you if they think you are a harm to yourself, etc.
These laws and structures in place i think adequately demonstrates that *absolute* bodily autonomy does not exist but is rather an ideal we as Americans hold in high regard. I would argue your bodily autonomy stops where another begins (the life of the unborn specifically).