Letter to the editor: the importance of forests
One of OU’s greatest features is its forested campus. Few universities can boast the wooded acreage we have, bequeathed to us by Matilda Wilson, a visionary who reinvented herself through hard work and determination, rising from the working class to become the most wealthy woman in the world.
Matilda Wilson gave the people of Michigan these forested acres. She recognized that this land is precious and wanted it to belong to the public. She founded the university to hold the land in trust.
The OU Vision Statement reads: “Oakland University will unlock the potential of individuals and leave a lasting impact on the world through the transformative power of education and research.” Despite Matilda Wilson’s vision and the University’s own Vision Statement, however, OU administrators propose to build a boutique hotel and shopping center on the corner of Adams & Walton. More shopping? Why do we need this? The university says they want to “leverage underutilized land,” but the word “underutilized” is a misnomer. It ignores the important work forests do for us: making oxygen, purifying water, storing carbon dioxide, regenerating the soil and preventing erosion. That list doesn’t even include the beauty and solace forests provide, and their effect on people driving through campus and walking in its woods. We preserve land because we know it’s important to all of us who pass through those green spaces, and because, given the current climate crisis, it is imperative that we stop the overdevelopment trend in the US, and instead start to preserve and protect our natural resources.
We need our administrative leaders to remember that they too can be visionaries like Matilda Wilson. They should lead the community, reminding all of us how important it is to recognize that our natural resources are finite, applying in their leadership “the transformative power of education and research,” rather than chasing revenue in a fashion that contravenes the very purpose of the university.
The end goal of human aspiration is not to develop shopping malls and turn a beautiful campus into a commercial development that will contribute to urban heat islands and rob us of the historical value of the OU campus. Instead, we should keep the forests that OU still has, so we have places where students can go to step away from their digitally-driven lives, and relax in the revitalizing green space. Where they can do biology research out in protected, valued forests, and sit under those trees to discuss the great American visionaries of the past and present.
How can those visionaries guide us today? Rather than destroying OU’s natural resources, we should be exploring ways to further utilize them—to leverage them in ways that complement and assist our educational mission. Perhaps community members would pay to enroll in “Nature Retreats” on campus. Perhaps educational tours of our forests and wetlands would increase interest in OU throughout southeastern Michigan. Has the administration explored such possibilities? Reached out to the OU community for ideas?
The OU Mission Statement begins “Oakland University cultivates the full potential of a diverse and inclusive community.” We need to include our students, the future leaders of the world. Faced with climate change, their job is to help us figure out how we can avert the devastating changes now wreaking havoc on our planet and threatening the lives of our children. Students can sit under OU’s trees and think about Matilda’s vision, as well as the visions of two great American thinkers, Henry David Thoreau and Wendell Berry. Thoreau said: “In wildness is the preservation of the world.” Wendell Berry added: “In human culture is the preservation of wildness.”
We urge administration to put students first and lead by example as we enter this new phase of worldwide response to climate change. Teach the community that forests have an intrinsic value for people.
old school OU alum • Sep 20, 2022 at 3:57 PM
Let’s not forget the R&S Sharf Golf Course and the loss of land from the OU Preserves. How has that worked out? Has it generated the income as intended?
Pissed-off faculty • Sep 17, 2022 at 1:26 PM
Oh, yeah, the importance. During the September OU Senate session, Prof. of Communication Lily Mendoza gave a vacuous five-minute soliloquy on “sustainability as a prime value in seeking to co-create a continuously deepening capacity for sustainability thinking, living, and visioning with students, faculty, staff, and the community at large.” Of course, now we need money to implement “Sustainability Tracking Assessment & Rating System (STARS)
– a transparent, self-reporting framework for colleges and universities to measure their sustainability performance.” That is, to raise the level of pseudo-academic bullshit even higher by adding a fake criterion of courses’ quality based on “non-anthropocentric approaches to teaching any given subject
by orienting its ethical vision towards enhancing the whole (biodiverse) community of life, in addition to the human.” Now (drums rolling!), we will log the Walton-Adams forest and build hell knows what to generate revenue for these preposterous programs. Bravo! Bravissimo! Encore! Glory be to the Senate, this utter travesty of “shared governance,” where not a single concern was raised in response to this flagrant, unmitigated, unadulterated nonsense!
Lily Mendoza • Sep 17, 2022 at 10:19 PM
I’m happy to have a conversation in this regard, but not with someone anonymously. Please identify yourself, then we can talk.
Annie, thank you for speaking for so many of us in regard to this proposed development. A Senate discussion of this matter is long overdue!
Lily Mendoza • Sep 18, 2022 at 12:26 PM
Apologies for missing acknowledgment of Kevin Grimm as co-contributor. Thank you, Kevin!
Alex Rusakov • Sep 18, 2022 at 6:54 PM
Dear Professors Mendoza and Tiegs:
First and foremost, please accept my sincere apologies for this meltdown. It was unacceptable to flip out like that, regardless of my opinions or what may have triggered me in the quoted narrative.
While likely infused with cowardice and paranoia, my reluctance to speak up at such meetings is due to the lack of tenure protection and zero trust in the administration. Furthermore, I was floored by the quality of the Grad School Dean’s presentation. With barely any raised eyebrows from tenured faculty, I found it futile and unsafe to contribute to further discussion.
I am fully on your side concerning ECN. However, seeing our role in “shared governance” reduced to the crumbs of secondary (tertiary, quarternary, you name it) issues and having observed the administration’s modus operandi in the latest round of faculty contract negotiations and numerous absurdities that followed, I am left hopeless about the prospects of stopping them in their tracks.
Again, please accept my apologies for the unthoughtful and harsh words.
Sincerely,
Alex Rusakov
Jeffrey Insko • Sep 19, 2022 at 10:55 AM
I came here this morning to speak up for Lily (my friend and collaborator) also, but am glad to see this apology, Alex. That takes real character. Lily is, to say the least, very much one of the good guys. And, like you, we are all pissed off. But at the same time we’re still trying to fight– while also mindful that our tenured status allows for it a way it might not for others. Anyway, I hope you’ll consider joining us at CASE! Solidarity and community-building can be buoying, a productive complement to anger and frustration!
Lily Mendoza • Sep 19, 2022 at 12:57 PM
Thank you, Alex—apology accepted. Appreciate your willingness to be vulnerable and self-identify.
I’ll be most happy to have a chat sometime and hope you can bring some of your energy to CASE. As Jeff mentioned, you’ll find you’re not alone in your anger and frustration. That’s the gift we found when we got together as a community, all of us wishing to fight for sustainability and good governance. I look forward to interacting at some point when it’s good for you.
Alex Rusakov • Sep 20, 2022 at 7:19 PM
Lily, Jeffrey — thank you for your kindness! More soon as I collect my thought (whatever is left of them).
Scott Tiegs • Sep 18, 2022 at 10:38 AM
Lily, thanks for taking the time to speak to the senate, and for all your many many other sustainability efforts on campus, including opposition to the East Campus shopping/boutique hotel project (Who as done more for sustainability on campus than you?). I’m sorry Pissed Off called you out by name in such an unproductive fashion (unproductive because they seemed to be aligned with many of us who are unified in our opposition to the proposed East Campus Nonsense[ECN]). And Pissed Off, whoever you are, if you are sincerely fired up about the ECN, you could have spoken at the Senate Meeting too, and you could avail yourself to speak at the next Senate Meeting.
Pamela Meyer • Sep 16, 2022 at 8:20 AM
What a great letter – I did not know that they are thinking of building a shopping center and hotel on OU property. This is a university – not retail space. Green space is very limited now and we need to embrace what OU has. OU has a treasure and to use this green space for something that Rochester Hills already has a lot of is a shame. Please do not ruin such a beautiful campus.
Angel Bakos • Aug 29, 2023 at 11:32 PM
Rochester Hills does not have an abundance of ‘green space. The city has allowed an exponential amount of development! Long-term residents who put down roots, when the community was lush, are prevailing upon the city to stop approving numerous changes in zoning that increases construction opportunities.
Julie Frontera • Sep 16, 2022 at 12:03 AM
Thank you for so eloquently speaking the many thoughts I have as well. As a long time resident of Rochester Hills, I have always been so grateful for the big expanse of fresh green to rest my eyes on at OU and Meadowbrook. And I have had faith that a highly respected University, full of knowledge, foresight and resources, would be the ultimate protector of the natural beauty they’re so fortunate to be enveloped in. To learn of the plans developing now to use that all too precious space for unnecessary duplicated shopping etc is more than deeply disappointing; it will be difficult for our family to continue our support of the University and Meadowbrook Hall if this project is allowed to continue. OU has the ability to do the right thing, and that’s what we should be able to expect from them.
Scott Tiegs • Sep 25, 2022 at 5:01 PM
Thanks for this Julie. You aren’t alone in your thoughts and sentiments, and please know that from dozens of conversations with faculty, students, staff, administrators and alumni, I have learned that there is little support for the proposed shopping mall/boutique hotel development. I don’t mention this to give you hope that the project won’t happen (I fear it will), but rather to let you know that the campus is still filled with thoughtful folks like yourself who want to do the right thing.
Scott Tiegs • Sep 15, 2022 at 4:08 PM
Losing that woodlot on the corner of Walton and Adams, and all that greenspace, would be such a pity. Thanks for your thoughtful letter, Annie.
Robert Anderson • Sep 15, 2022 at 2:38 PM
Thanks for the excellent letter.
Karen Golm • Sep 15, 2022 at 1:22 PM
Annie and Kevin,
This heartfelt well informed letter encompasses the ideals of an erudite and caring community. We, as a community, need to think globally and act locally by preserving the natural spaces we have left. I for one hope that the administration of Oakland University is listening.
Karen Golm, Rochester Hills resident