Elections? How about popularity contest

By
Posted: Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012 at 10:53 pm | Last Updated: Monday, April 9th, 2012 at 6:59 am

View Comments Comments Print This Article Print This Email This Article Email This Tweet This Article Tweet This Add This Article to Delicious Delicious

Samantha Wolf and Robbie Williford won against James Sklar and Tommy Chen to become the student body president and vice president of the Oakland University Student Congress for the 2012-13 academic year. This victory does not come without some skepticism, however.

It was confirmed by soon-to-be former Student Congress President Ben Evelsage that Sklar and Chen had 13 grievances filed against them and were found guilty of six of them, losing an overall 27 percent of their votes.

Some of the grievances filed against Sklar and Chen included serving food on campus, playing music and using areas of the sidewalk that weren’t rented ahead of time.

I have no problem that Wolf and Williford won. Congratulations. You’ll do well.

However, I do have a problem that the Sklar and Chen campaign received 13 grievances when the Wolf/Williford campaign received none.

Even further, the grievances filed against the Skalr/Chen campaign came complete with photographs of the offenses.

Considering some of the things that I saw, read and heard prior to and at the election results, I’m rather shocked that grievances weren’t filed to other candidates.

Next week’s issue of The Oakland Post will feature a story about the Pokéchalkers, a couple that traveled across the campus and drew Pokémon art.

I noticed something different a week ago before walking in the Oakland Center and admiring their drawings. They were desecrated.

On the ground, with the Pokéchalker’s drawing, the words “vote Williford/Wolf” were written in a bubble, connecting to the artwork.

Pokéchalker Michael Danielson said there was more than one location these words were written, and they weren’t written by him.

Though the Williford and Wolf campaign has denied writing the messages, I find it hard to believe.

It’s unlikely a random student would take time out of their day to write that. This can only mean that the people who wrote it were the ones who denied writing it, or people from their campaign.

This is a display of unethical conduct. Respect the artist’s drawings. You don’t see the Romney or Obama campaigners writing “vote for Romney/Obama” on the Mona Lisa.

Looking at Wolf and Williford’s campaigners, it seems they have committed a lowbrow tactic.

Sklar and Chen respected the art and left it alone, something that the Wolf/Williford campaigners should have done.

But of course, their campaign had no grievances filed against them.

Ask yourself, which is more suitable for punishment, a person giving out free ice cream, or a person that is using someone else’s art to gain political advantage?

The distance in which they were handing out the ice cream is a null and void argument, because there was a written message on someone else’s art, promoting candidates Wolf and Williford.

If you are going to file a grievance for giving free food to students and playing music, you better file a grievance for taking someone’s art and writing a political message on it without permission.

Things got even more suspicious during the election results.

There was a high amount of legislators wearing Wolf/Williford shirts. It’s rather perplexing the legislators would wear those shirts when they have their own campaigns to run.

Not to forget, these classy legislators were also wearing these shirts in front of opposing candidate Tommy Chen, so he could see they do not support him.

What do actual legislators do? They show impartiality.

The Student Congress elections were not an election — they were a popularity contest from the start. Next time, keep the shirts at home and try to maintain some professionalism. High school was about two or three years ago for some of you.

It’s no wonder Sklar didn’t show up at the results.

After current Vice President Elisa Malile tweeted the grievances out the day before the results, it was obvious everyone already knew who won.

The worst thing though?

Over 20 percent of the students that voted for Chen and Sklar did not have their votes counted for, which leads me to my proposition of a new motto: change the motto from, “Your voice. Heard.” to “Your voice. Muzzled unless you support who we support.”

CORRECTION: Oakland University Student Congress Vice President Elisa Malile tweeted the grievances before the election results, not before the elections.

Justin Colman is a Copy Editor at The Oakland Post. He can be reached via email at jbcolman@oakland.edu and followed on Twitter @JustinColman

EMU


  • Owen O’Connor

    I’m going to start this by saying that I have a very biased opinion of this election. Robbie and Sam are both very good friends of mine and I obviously supported them from the beginning. That being said, some of these facts were a little off and I want to try to set the record straight a little bit. First, that Gyarados was not drawn by the Pokechalker. It was drawn by another friend of mine. That does not change the fact that it is artwork, but “desecrated” is a huge stretch. The words were written below the chalking and did not even so much as overlap a single line of chalk. Also, the reason there were so many grievances against Sklar/Chen was that they were doing things that were blatantly against the bylaws. I have absolutely no ties to OUSC other than knowing a few people that work for them. Even though I’ve never been a part of OUSC, I knew a lot of the rules that they were breaking. It’s up to the individual candidates to familiarize themselves with the bylaws before campaigning, and if they don’t they’re likely to break a few. Sam and Robbie knew the bylaws and therefore avoided breaking them. Sklar very blatantly broke the bylaws numerous times. That was where the penalties came from.

  • Christine Aranda

    PREACH!

    “Over 20 percent of the students that voted for Chen and Sklar did not have their votes counted for, which leads me to my proposition of a new motto: change the motto from, “Your voice. Heard.” to “Your voice. Muzzled unless you support who we support.””

    WHAT? WHAT…WHAT?!

  • Justin Schnurer

    Popularity Contest? What election isn’t a popularity contest? Two sides are battling to gain supporters, AKA getting people to like them over the other guy. How is that not trying to win popularity?

    I am biased as well, as I am good friends with Robbie and Samantha. However, this article mentions that supporters of Wolf/Williford were “desecrating” the chalk art for Sklar Chen. This article does not at all mention that Sklar and Chen were doing it as well. I recall seeing Wolf/Williford Chalk art outside of Vandenberg. It read “Vote for Wolf Williford.” then later, I saw the same image with “or Sklar/Chen for free scantrons.” written underneath. There were a few other witnesses who saw Sklar/Chen chalk written over Wolf/Williford chalk as well.

    The article says Wolf/Williford were breaking the rules as well. Why weren’t grievances filed against them? Its not like supporters of them were snooping and spying on Sklar/Chen to catch them either. As mentioned earlier, they were very blatantly breaking the rules right in front of dozens of people. If you are running for an office, it is your job to know all the rules and bylaws of whatever area you are campaigning over to ensure you do not get into trouble. I’ve never heard of a policy where broken rules aren’t supposed to be reported or punished either.

    I think what really hurt Sklar/Chen was that they emphasized over and over the subject of free scantrons. I never once heard either one talk about a different subject with exception of the debates where they had to discuss other matters. It would be nice, but I feel there are many bigger issues that needs to be addressed. If you were to search your room and your car, you could fine enough spare change to buy scantrons for a semester.

    No one’s voice was ever muzzled by supporters of the other side. In my opinion Sklar/Chen hurt their own voice and lost support because they were breaking so many rules, in addition to them really only campaigning on one point of emphasis.